| User | Post |
|
7:06 am April 23, 2008
| admin
Admin
| | | |
|
| posts 36 |
|
|
As a result of an upcoming traffic enforcement legal case, I would like to poll readers on the following question.
Please feel free to add your comment in this forum. Your opinion is very valuable. Actually, your comment is vital to this poll, so that each vote may be validated by an actual person’s comment.
Thanks for your input. -STA Admin
If you saw a person like this, standing beside the road, waving to people, and holding this sign, could/would you think this “sign” is an “official traffic-control device”?
Note: The actual poll has been discontinued; but, please feel free to add your thoughts about the question posed.

Read original blog post |
|
|
1:01 pm April 23, 2008
| Doug Otoupal
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
I don't see how this sign could be mistaken for an official sign. I don't remember the word “Trap” on any traffic control sign I've ever seen.
|
|
|
8:08 am April 28, 2008
| James
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
There is no way I could mistake that for an official sign. Official signs are normally standing on their own unless construction workers have to direct traffic themselves.
|
|
|
8:48 pm April 28, 2008
| Melinda
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
Absolutely no way would I think that was any kind of official traffic device. The color is all wrong, the wording is all wrong, it is not standing alone, and the guy holding it is wearing a simple polo shirt and slacks – not exactly “official” attire for any road crew member.
|
|
|
3:00 pm May 2, 2008
| Faster than you…
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
I can completley sympathize for your cause and am (sadly) not suprised by the underhanded methods by which the officer changed his story. We all know speeding tickets are a huge source of revanue for municipalities like Lakeway. Mess with their money and you get the full wrath.
Having said that, it pains me to confess: the color and shape of your sign does make it look official. However, the method by which you displayed it (hand held) and the message you conveyed should weigh in your favor.
I feel you would be much better off pursuing other avenues of denfense. More specifically, your 1st amendment rights.
|
|
|
8:46 pm May 10, 2008
| Lucky225
New Member
| | | |
|
| posts 11 |
|
|
Does not look like an official traffic control device to me :X
|
|
|
12:29 pm May 15, 2008
| Cameron Kuhns
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
I woulkd take that as a warning and slow down so I don't get ticketed. It does not strike me as a traffic control sign.
|
|
|
4:54 pm June 29, 2008
| James Routh
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
There is no way that could be seen as an official traffic-control device.
|
|
|
10:29 am September 6, 2008
| Bubba
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
Looks like you and the POlice are trying to do the same thing, slow down those speedin MFers. But honestly you went about it all wrong. Try standing out there with your sign and NO radar or police were present. This way it looks like you just have it out for the POlice and not concerned with those speedin MFers out there. Just go stand on a street and hold up your sign saying SLOW DOWN, that would confuse the POlice and the public.
|
|
|
3:37 pm October 15, 2008
| Lucky225
New Member
| | | |
|
| posts 11 |
|
|
I just thought about this, sometimes things come to me after the fact. But if the intent of the law behind using 'official looking traffic control devices' can somehow be applied to your speedtrapahead.org sign, then why is it not equally applied to school crossing guards who carry non-MUTCD stop signs. Perhaps crossing guards have some special exemption? I don't know, just dawned on me when I went to pick up my nephew from school a couple days ago. Even a school staffer who was NOT and official crossing guard, was using a hand-made stop sign to help students in front of the school not at the intersection… So when it's about the children it's okay, because it's public safety — but when it's about slowing down cars.. oh wait that's public safety too. My point? It's not like you planted the sign in the ground on the highway as to where someone would think it was an official sign, it was hand carried, much like a crossing guards sign, and I think that falls well within the meaning of free speech.
|
|
|
3:53 pm March 18, 2011
| PeterEgan
New Member
| | | |
|
| posts 8 |
|
|
The only way someone could interpret that as being an “official” sign is if that person had an agenda that in order to be achieved, said interpretation must be applied
|
|